tag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:/discussions/problems/31-bug-in-102swc-could-also-be-in-101Robotlegs: Discussion 2013-04-28T10:02:54Ztag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/8714222010-01-18T16:13:40Z2010-01-18T16:13:40ZBug in 1.0.2.swc (could also be in 1.0.1)<div><p>Hey Jos,</p>
<p>thanks for the bug report - and apologies for the regression,
which<br>
I've probably caused in SwiftSuspenders, from the look of
things.</p>
<p>I'll take a look and see if I can reproduce the problem
without<br>
further info. Will let you know once I've fixed or can't
reproduce.</p>
<p>cheers,<br>
till</p></div>Till Schneidereittag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/8714222010-01-18T20:12:02Z2010-01-18T20:12:02ZBug in 1.0.2.swc (could also be in 1.0.1)<div><p>Ok, this is rather embarrassing: In fixing a previous problem I
added a wrong mapping to the integrated XML configuration. This is
fixed in the attached SWC and will be deployed to the official
github repository shortly.</p></div>Till Schneidereittag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/8714222010-01-18T20:42:01Z2010-01-18T20:42:01ZBug in 1.0.2.swc (could also be in 1.0.1)<div><p>Excellent - thanks! Looking forward to a 1.0.3 release ;)</p>
<p>j</p></div>Jos Yuletag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/8714222010-01-18T20:47:17Z2010-01-18T20:47:17ZBug in 1.0.2.swc (could also be in 1.0.1)<div><p>You can use the attached SWC - it should be byte-for-byte
identical to what's going to be released on github</p></div>Till Schneidereittag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/8714222010-01-19T13:46:20Z2010-01-19T13:46:20ZBug in 1.0.2.swc (could also be in 1.0.1)<div><p>Howdy folks, v1.0.3 is live. Yos, could you check it out to
ensure it's functioning correctly? Many thanks,</p></div>Shaun Smithtag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/8714222010-01-20T15:35:01Z2010-01-20T15:35:01ZBug in 1.0.2.swc (could also be in 1.0.1)<div><p>Yep, that looks gold, thanks!</p>
<p>j</p></div>Jos Yuletag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/8714222010-01-20T15:39:28Z2010-01-20T15:39:28ZBug in 1.0.2.swc (could also be in 1.0.1)<div><p>Thanks for verifying the fix!</p></div>Till Schneidereit