tag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:/discussions/robotlegs-2/8-robotlegs-20-how-to-get-involvedRobotlegs: Discussion 2012-08-27T10:37:11Ztag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-11T22:52:31Z2011-06-11T22:52:32ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>sadly the survey link does not work - just says "Thank you!"</p></div>edzistag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-11T23:26:34Z2011-06-11T23:26:34ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>There was an "r/" too much in the URL, the correct one is</p>
<p><a href=
"http://twtpoll.com/xo5sfn">http://twtpoll.com/xo5sfn</a></p>
<p>@Stray: I've also changed the link in your original message</p></div>Till Schneidereittag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-12T08:35:15Z2011-06-12T08:35:15ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>@edzis - Sorry about that! I guess I didn't check it thoroughly
enough.</p>
<p>@till - thanks - much appreciated - must remember to click my
own links in future!</p></div>Straytag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-12T18:27:46Z2011-06-12T18:27:47ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>Just want to say I am very happy about the news and look forward
to see what kind of tricks you have up your sleves. If you improve
something that is already awesome, what do you got ;-)</p></div>Thomas Troelsentag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-20T01:33:46Z2011-06-20T01:33:46ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>Yeah! {RL}<sup>2</sup></p>
<p>I want help with the ASDocs ^_^</p></div>gz.franciscotag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-22T01:57:26Z2011-06-22T01:57:26ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>FWIW, I think RL 1.0 is perfect. Occasionally I want other
things than what i get out of RL, but to date, every feature
request has turned out to be, very clearly, an extension and not
core.</p></div>squeedeetag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-22T18:31:28Z2011-06-22T18:31:28ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>Wow what a stinking lie.</p>
<p>Sorry. I do have one major gripe with RL1.0, an It's an amazing
person who fixes it. It's really hard to extend :D I can't imagine
any performant way of solving extensibility issues tho, it's a
language problem, not a framework problem.</p>
<p>Not sure if I need to spell out what I mean, I think the core
team are aware, that when you want to add to an interface, such as
adding a commandMap.someOtherMappingMethod, this means you don't
want a ICommandMap interface on the Context, but a
IMyExtendedCommandMap, which means you now need an
MyExtendedContext. If someone else has written an extension to
Context that you quite like, you now have to work out how to order
them, or you just merge them. Either way, version control and
patching becomes extremely problematic.</p></div>squeedeetag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/78037422011-06-22T18:41:19Z2011-06-22T18:41:19ZRobotlegs 2.0 - how to get involved<div><p>That's our main priority in RL2 - extensibility.</p>
<p>Like I said above - nobody ever imagined RL would become so
popular that you'd have the problem of wanting use multiple
utilities at the same time... it's a great problem to have
though!</p>
<p>FWIW - there is no reason why the context needs to have a
reference to a util generally, so in most cases you can just add a
util through a boot strap command (or plain old object or package
level function that you pass the injector to) - as the injector
will hold the reference. But yes - this is the main pain point and
will be the focus of a lot of energy!</p></div>Stray