tag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:/discussions/solutions/3-fdt-templatesRobotlegs: Discussion 2018-10-18T16:35:09Ztag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/12091002010-05-04T20:39:54Z2010-05-04T20:39:55ZFDT Templates<div><p>Update on the templates!</p>
<p>Added two new ones: (These only come handy if you are not "quick
fixing")<br>
var<br>
function</p>
<p>After I found out about FDT's specifier capabilities, I had to
incorporate then into it templates. So enjoy!</p></div>Matan Ubersteintag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/12091002010-05-04T20:46:45Z2010-05-04T20:46:48ZFDT Templates<div><p>Wow, I really made a mess of that one sentence there, hehe.</p>
<p>What I was trying to say is; After I found out about FDT's
specifier capabilities, I had to incorporate them into the
templates.</p>
<p>Key difference is when you map a listener with the "mapListener"
template, you'll see that instead of putting the "eventDispatcher"
straight on, FDT will hint for "eventDispatcher" or "view". I find
that these two are most common.</p></div>Matan Ubersteintag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/12091002010-12-13T19:25:54Z2010-12-13T19:25:55ZFDT Templates<div><p>How about Rl templates for IntelliJ?</p></div>eco_bachtag:robotlegs.tenderapp.com,2009-10-18:Comment/12091002010-12-13T21:06:13Z2010-12-13T21:06:13ZFDT Templates<div><p>I've got a few that I've created for IntelliJ. I keep meaning to
put<br>
them up on my GitHub. (I've already got my Robotlegs templates
for<br>
Burrito up there.)</p>
<p>Paul</p></div>Paul Robertson